|
On February 26, 2002 The New York Women's Foundation (NYWF) held
its third annual Public Forum, entitled "Women on Welfare:
Where are They Going?" Representatives from NYWF grantees Urban
Justice Center, Welfare Rights Initiative, and Make the Road by
Walking appeared with Trudi Renwick, an economist with the Fiscal
Policy Institute, and Dr. Frances Fox Piven, a nationally renowned
social welfare policy scholar.
Dr. Piven opened the evening with a discussion of the ideology
and history behind federal welfare reform legislation passed in
1996 and the resulting structure of welfare programs as they affect
poor women today. She said that the 1996 welfare reform act was
the result of a three-decade-long campaign against Aid to Families
with Dependent Children, the welfare system established after the
Depression. Proponents of welfare reform advocated that welfare
had a debilitating effect on poor women; welfare restrictions and
work mandates were seen as the necessary remedies, Dr. Piven noted.
In Dr. Piven's view, the effect of welfare reform was four-fold.
She observed that the reform's five-year cap on receipt of benefits
limited poor women's assistance from the government. The new law
also imposed work requirements as a condition of receiving benefits,
and it eliminated decades of reforms and case law designed to make
the welfare system accountable to the public. Dr. Piven noted that
perhaps most significantly, the law's allocation to states of a
set amount of welfare funds, the unspent balance of which could
be used for other purposes, created financial incentives for states
to reduce welfare enrollment.
The direct effect of these policies, Dr. Piven said, is today's
welfare system, in which recipients are at risk of losing benefits
for failure to comply with the rules. A leading cause for a welfare
recipient's loss of benefits is a missed appointment; it is nearly
impossible to reschedule an appointment at the welfare center, and
missing one due to child care problems or language barriers can
have devastating consequences, Dr. Piven noted.
Further, Dr. Piven added, families seeking assistance are actively
diverted from
receiving that help. Welfare recipients are routinely referred to
food pantries when they are eligible for food stamps, said Dr. Piven.
She noted that caseworkers using deficient computer systems may
incorrectly terminate a family's entire assistance case -- food
stamps, Medicaid, and cash assistance -- upon employment, rather
than discontinuing only the cash assistance.
Dr. Piven reported that while the total number of welfare recipients
has dropped over 50% nationwide since 1996, poverty has actually
deepened. Most former Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF)
recipients who find work have jobs that pay between $5.50 and $7.00
per hour and offer no benefits. Median monthly earnings amount to
$1,149, which is below the federal poverty line for a family of
three. Work is scarce for many former recipients due to their lack
of skills and education, and the city's recession has added to the
problem. Dr. Piven observed that in some cases, these former welfare
recipients were forced to seek emergency services to provide food,
had their utilities cut off, or were evicted and went to homeless
shelters. In 1997, among families who had left welfare, only 42%
of those eligible for food stamps were receiving them.
Dr. Piven pointed to the federal welfare reform legislation's reauthorization
in September 2002 as an opportunity to create positive welfare policies
that would focus on repairing the social "safety net"
to assist women in transition from poverty to higher education and/or
"living wage" employment. Dr. Piven urged the audience
to listen to women who are directly affected by welfare reform for
a comprehensive understanding on what it takes to become economically
self-sufficient.
After Dr. Piven's address, panelist Trudi Renwick expanded on Dr.
Piven's critique of the welfare system. Ms. Renwick noted that in
New York State, where welfare enrollment has dropped over 50%, 20%
of all children and 40% of African-American children live in poverty.
She quoted a recent study that revealed that, of total families
who had left welfare, two-thirds reported being worse off economically.
The panel focused first on the effects of welfare policies on poor
women's ability to make the transition out of poverty and then discussed
immediate and long-term reforms that would make welfare work for
the women of New York City. Leslie Monroy, of Make the Road by Walking,
an organization that develops leadership skills of low-income immigrant
women in Brooklyn, said that without adequate translation services,
many non-English speakers are unable to follow the complicated rules
governing receipt of welfare. Ms. Monroy urged audience members
to support the Equal Access to Health and Human Services Bill that
would affect as many as 100,000 people in New York City by ensuring
interpreters and translated documents for non-English speaking welfare
recipients at welfare centers.
Panelist Sham-e-Ali al-Jamil, an attorney at the Urban Justice
Center who represents domestic violence survivors experiencing problems
obtaining benefits, described the procedural hurdles faced by her
clients in complying with rules that endanger their safety. She
noted that women are routinely required, in order to maintain their
benefits, to file a child support claim against their batterers,
even if doing so would endanger the women and their children by
revealing their whereabouts. Failure to comply may result in case
closure, thus depriving many women of any economic assistance and
chilling their urge to seek protection from abuse.
Roxanna Henry of the Welfare Rights Initiative, a group that trains
women on welfare who are enrolled at CUNY to advocate for higher
education, described the difficulties welfare recipients face if
they want to go to school while receiving public assistance. She
noted that since the advent of welfare reform, 27,000 City University
of New York students who were on welfare were required to leave
school in order to perform "Work Experience Program (WEP)"
duties such as cleaning the parks and streets. Ms. Henry asked the
audience to support the Access to Training and Education Bill, which
would expand the concept of "work" to include education
and training that would fulfill WEP requirements. The bill would
also help the students who left college to participate in WEP to
re-enroll.
Dr. Piven stressed the importance of access to education, training,
and childcare, and she urged the reimposition of due process and
accountability in the welfare system. Trudi Renwick encouraged audience
members to support raising the minimum wage to better meet the actual
cost of living. Finally, panelists advocated for a social welfare
system that supports financial independence through meaningful education
and training and offers genuine access to these and other critical
building blocks to economic self-sufficiency.
|